Phoney Allegiance to the Constitution is like Devil Quoting Scripture
I have heard ad nauseam that Asaduddin Owaisi is a Barrister by profession as he studied at the prestigious Lincoln’s Inn of London. However, I must confess that I have neither seen him arguing any case nor read any reported judgments argued by Shri Owaisi, yet he is praised for his very sharp forensic knowledge. I have sometimes heard his envenomed speeches in Parliament and other public meetings, but they have never been able to appeal to the reason or logic of any person of average prudence. Therefore, those who often eulogise him for his in-depth learning are not objective observers but the blind followers of his noxious politics.
Although the number of lawyers in politics is
certainly higher than other professionals yet most of them have neither shone
in politics nor in the legal profession. Politics is an
altogether different ballgame, and the brilliance of lawyering or advocacy
does not play a very significant role. Many lawyers have certainly made a mark
in the legal profession regardless of their political hues or colours, but one
is not dependent on the other. Nobody expects consistency in politics but, at
least, in the legal profession consistency cannot be shed or shunned for
political expediency. A good politician is expected to be a beacon of
light for those who follow their leader, but Owaisi shows more of his tantrums
than exuding logic of light.
His recent statements avowing loyalty to the
constitution with regard to the Places of Worship Act, introduced by Parliament
in 1991 depict his duplicity and insincerity. It is like the famous Shakespearian
quote in Merchant of Venice that ‘the devil can cite Scriptures for his
purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness is like a villain with a smiling
cheek’. Look at his specious loyalty. He had shown his contempt for the
abrogation of Article 370 and 35 A from the constitution or CAA or NRC but in
the case of Gyanvapi, he has become an unflinching votary of the amendments to
the constitution.
Article 368 of the Indian constitution
provides flexibility that allows for the required changes, which can be brought
about as per the wishes and aspirations of the people. In fact, even the basic
structure theory as enunciated in the Keshvanand Bharti also cannot remain as
rigid as to be written in stone like the Ten Biblical Commandments. The
Constitution has to be an organic one, it can be changed/amended or altered as
and when the need arises. Shri Owaisi is a lawmaker by virtue of being a Member
of Parliament, but he should not try to browbeat the public by showing his
phoney allegiance to the constitution of India and claiming to have a better
understanding than others because he happened to be a Barrister, at least by
holding the degree if not by practice.
The Government must, therefore, try to
convince the Muslim leadership to transfer at least Kashi, Mathura and some
other places of worship to Hindus which scream by their structure to be
theirs.
Comments