Only artificial intelligence can alleviate the burden on courts.
The staggering number
of pending cases in various courts across the country has exceeded 5.2 crore.
District Courts are inundated with over 85% of these cases, while High Courts
and the Supreme Court also contend with a significant number of unresolved cases.
Over 180,000 cases have been pending for more than 30 years. Land and property
disputes account for 20% of all pending cases and 66% of all civil cases. The
number of cases is likely to rise in the coming days for various reasons. The
reality is that as long as technology, particularly Artificial Intelligence
(AI), is not utilised, incidents of fraud, cheating, false cases, and even
legitimate cases will continue to escalate. According to a report published by
Niti Aayog in 2018, at the current disposal rate, it would take more than 324
years to clear the backlog.
According to a report
published on 13th May in the Hindustan Times, a case of forgery has emerged. In
this case, the Supreme Court has withdrawn its ruling in a land dispute after
it was brought to its attention that the favourable verdict was obtained
through a fabricated settlement and a "ghost" respondent.
On 13 December 2024,
the Supreme Court quashed the orders of a Muzaffarpur trial court and the Patna
High Court, which were based on a purported compromise agreement between the
petitioner and the respondent. However, it was discovered that the supposed respondent
was an impostor, and the real respondent was unaware of the proceedings, only
learning of the order five months later. He promptly approached the Supreme
Court through his lawyer, alleging that the order had been obtained through
fraud, deception, and the suppression of material facts.
The petitioner in the
case has not only violated legal and ethical norms but has also perpetrated
fraud upon the court, which, if not rectified, will embolden such mala fide
litigants to continue their deceitful practices, according to the plea.
Notably, the original order recorded the appearance of four advocates for the
fictitious respondent. However, during a new hearing, a lawyer representing an
advocate who had previously appeared informed the bench that he is 80 years old
and has not practised law recently.
This situation further
underscores the importance of employing Artificial Intelligence (AI), which
will aid in identifying cheating, fraud, and forgery by both advocates and
litigants. For instance, AI can meticulously adjudicate cases involving land
compensation, chalan, and cheque bouncing. Through the proper use of AI, the
number of cases could be reduced by more than 50 per cent in under six months.
Comments